Combining flash with a wide aperture lens

Combining flash with a wide aperture lens

shot at f1.4 with flash

When you refer to a wide aperture lens, you are generally talking about a lens with a maximum aperture of f2.8 or more, with the most popular maximum aperture lenses being f2.8, f1.8 and f1.4. Canon users can choose from a variety of f1.2 lenses, while Micro Four Thirds users also have the extremely fast but manual focus only f0.95 lens available.

The wider the aperture of your lens, the more light you can let into your camera. You might therefore assume that such a lens lets in so much light that flash is no longer required, but I don’t think so and today I’ll explain why.

[box_grey]“I don’t need to use flash because I have a fast lens so I can shoot natural light“[/box_grey]

Everyone knows someone who loves to shoot natural light only. That’s not a bad thing, and that is what can dictate a person’s style of photography. For me though, natural light alone does not suffice, especially when you’re shooting people at events or parties.

1. You control the light instead of the light controlling you.

Available light might be beautiful, and shooting in it might be less intrusive and more memorable. But more often than not, the light that you’re dealing with generally isn’t best placed for shooting people. Here are some photos of my buddy who I was at a party with:

available light vs flash

f1.7 at ISO 400, 1/50s available light on the left and 1/125s with flash on the right

On the left, available light:

On the right, with flash:

 

2. If you use flash, you can freeze movement with ease.

 

freezing movement

1/250s at f2 at ISO 200 on a D700

In this photo we have Spider-Man jumping around in his living room. Spider-Man’s living room was bright, with a bunch of downlighters in the ceiling and nice white walls to bounce the light around evenly. I could have got some really nice natural light photos of him spinning his web by changing my camera settings to 1/80 and ISO 2000. If I had done that though, this photo would have been a blurry mess.

No amount of natural light is enough to freeze the movement of a crime fighting superhero, especially when he’s 5 years old. In fact, even at 1/250s (the max sync speed for my camera), you can see that he is still too quick for me – check out his left hand.

Again, in this situation the wide aperture lens has put some separation between Spider-Man and the cluttered background, as well as taken in the available light in the room to retain the mood.

3. A wide aperture is tied to a shallow depth of field.

It’s all good to shoot wide open in a dark room without flash, so long as you’re not taking photos of groups. A wide aperture not only lets a lot of light into your camera, but it also gives you a shallow depth of field. This is how you get background blur and separation between your subject and whatever is going on behind then. The wider your aperture, the shallower your depth of field will be.

If you are photographing an event and going around asking for couples to pose, f2.8 or so works pretty well. But sooner or later you’re going to get asked to photograph a big group together, and in those situations shooting at f2.8 means that you won’t get everyone in focus and you will need to stop down to f8 or so (depending on your camera).

Shooting at f8 means that you are letting in 3 stops less light than you were at f2.8 – and if the light is already dim, you probably aren’t going to get much of a picture at all. In fact, in this photo even f8 wasn’t enough (but you can’t tell because it’s so small):

Group at f8

1/100 at f8 at ISO 640

Having the flash to add to the available light was the only way I could have got this group photo and increased the depth of field.

In short: